About Stone, Scissor and Paper Game

 Objective Meditations about Zero Point

Can you belive in there might be some deterministic (unstochastic) laws of indeterministic (stochastic) fields?

It is quite difficult to express what i mean. When i was quite young, about 18, one of my biggest pretention was to play good poker, faultless poker. I was thinking for all cases, might there be a faultless way of playing?  Yes, there was about hundred per cent. I was not meaning to win always; this is something else.. Please imagine, the chess parties, and the interpretations than after.  I mean, a judgment, (of course a prompt one)  covering all the essential points of situation without falling of any controversies and conceiving all the controversies of your rival and to reach a sole, unique, logic solution.

At this time, i used to have a good fellow enthusiast of poker, as i am.. Most of the time, we were playing on the same time, but never side by side, always face to face. Being partner, is against the rules, sitting side by side. When we were sitting on the same table, the monophonic game were returning a symphony where both of were playing in a perfect harmony. My point is not self astonishment or talk about harmony; it might be issue of another essay.

My point is the game of stone, scissor, paper; I head learned this Japan based game through James Bond’s courtesy to Ian Fleming. Stone losses to paper, wins over scissor; paper losses to scissor, wins over stone and scissor losses to stone wins over paper i.e. scissor cuts paper , paper envelopes stone, stone blinds scissor. It is very well and evenly designed game, as an eastern thought game.. Let’s try to deconstruct it through western thought.

First step: Let’s assume you are playing against a first time player. If it was you who toughed the game, you have probably started to show it with stone, boxed hand, first it is the most common gesture and secondly it the most archaic type. Stone, is the initiation figure; at the game your rival as much as slow minded will stick on it as much as; if he/she very quick minded, a big success, he/she will shift to paper a figure that can beat Stone, assuming that you will do stone… It is up to you; you should first evaluate the quick-mindedness of your rival. To win the first hand, or at least finish scoreless, you had better to start with paper..

Analytical: You are asking probably; Wouldn’t he/she shift to scissor at all; might be, a male rival doesn’t start with scissor as it refers something threatening him; but the female rival might be up to according to her fixations. If it is so, you have better to cut your relation with her, forever, being as a male.

What i mean? To start with scissor requires much more strong brain power, it is the most complicated figure and thirdly (press on your feet heavily) it is psychologically obstacle.

Let’s consider the figures; from a analytical psychological point of view stone reminds aggressiveness, paper intellectual (phallic), productivity, motivations and scissor castration complex.

Anyone, even having some destructive feelings, probably will not to reveal it at first step; henceforth for someone, new in the game the scissor is quite low probability.

As a result, keep the feelings of your rival under control of your feelings; feel him/his passions send him/her positive or negative feedbacks to surprise him/her.

I think there is bias even in fair, equal circumtances toward to intelligence, knowledge, and feelings and virtue as the general tendency of univers; but never become winner obssesive; never fall in passion to win the game, only wish.

The best way of playing this game,is to play with EQ, the Mentor in yours will show you the way..